This episode was surreal, even for a Kaiba-episode. I think it has to do with a guy named “Jamie Vickers”, who was listed in the end-credits. His previous work includes a few episodes of Kemonozume, and the animation of the ED of Tokyo Tribe 2. This guy’s sense of style is even messier than that of Masaaki Yuasa.

Stupid statements like those are what would make you lose credibility as a blogger. I don’t really care how many people read your blog, but if you’re going to guess things about why a particular episode looks the way it does, would you mind either putting a caveat or not doing it at all? It’s misleading, and not to mention highly embarrassing.

Just because you see a “Jamie Vickers” in the ED doesn’t mean he’s automatically responsible for the sketchy look of this episode. Noticed how most of the episode looked like that but Mr. Vickers is only one of a number of key animation (genga) artists? (Can you even read the ending credits in the first place?)

Here’s the correct answer for you: look up the person who had most creative control over the episode, Choi Eunyoung (hey, it’s even in English! And for your information she did the script, storyboarding, animation direction and direction plus a bit of key animation)
Watch in particular episode 6 of Kemonozume. Thanks.

“This guy’s sense of style is even messier than that of Masaaki Yuasa.” Yeah. You watched Tokyo Tribe 2’s ED and compared it with Mind Game?
P.S. If you’re looking for Mr. Vickers’ work, he’s the animation director for episode 6, which you will notice is significantly un-messy.
Have a nice day.

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo…!