<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Genius Party - 05 - Limit Cycle Review - 72,5/100</title>
	<link>http://psgels.blogsome.com/2009/07/14/genius-party-05-limit-cycle-review-725100/</link>
	<description>An anime blog covering a large variety of series, both popular and underrated.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sheepdude</title>
		<link>http://psgels.blogsome.com/2009/07/14/genius-party-05-limit-cycle-review-725100/#comment-14795</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:12:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://psgels.blogsome.com/2009/07/14/genius-party-05-limit-cycle-review-725100/#comment-14795</guid>
					<description>I think the short deals more with limit cycles and deterministic chaos than the philosophic and religious talk. Not that I claim to understand the context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I think the short deals more with limit cycles and deterministic chaos than the philosophic and religious talk. Not that I claim to understand the context.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: PL</title>
		<link>http://psgels.blogsome.com/2009/07/14/genius-party-05-limit-cycle-review-725100/#comment-14612</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:34:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://psgels.blogsome.com/2009/07/14/genius-party-05-limit-cycle-review-725100/#comment-14612</guid>
					<description>What bothered me about this one, as a trained philosopher and literary critic, is that there was no argument to his dialogue, just literally rambling on several topics loosely tied together.  Sometimes he even contradicted himself, and not in a meaningful way, like Derrida or Heidegger, who use contradictions to point to something else.  At the end, I was so confused by what he was even trying to convey that any power the imagery had was wasted because I had to focus so hard on the monologue in order to not just drift off.  It might actually be an improvement to rip the audio from this one, lay some techno on top of it, and just watch the pretty colors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What bothered me about this one, as a trained philosopher and literary critic, is that there was no argument to his dialogue, just literally rambling on several topics loosely tied together.  Sometimes he even contradicted himself, and not in a meaningful way, like Derrida or Heidegger, who use contradictions to point to something else.  At the end, I was so confused by what he was even trying to convey that any power the imagery had was wasted because I had to focus so hard on the monologue in order to not just drift off.  It might actually be an improvement to rip the audio from this one, lay some techno on top of it, and just watch the pretty colors.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

