My blog has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://psgels.net
and update your bookmarks.

November 12, 2009

Rail of the Star Review - 77,5/100



Okay, to close off this mini-marathon I’ve been having the past week is Rail of the Star, a movie about the Japanese in Korea during and after WWII. It’s not just a movie about the horrors of war, but nationality is also a very huge theme. It again focuses on a young child as the lead character, called Chitose Kobayashi. Like most of the WWII movies I’ve reviewed in the past couple of days, it’s an autobiographical story. it’s not the best, but nevertheless worth the watch if you’re interested in the Second World War.

This movie is also structured in the way that the first half deals with slice of life, while the second half chronicles the characters during what probably was the hardest moments of their lives. In this movie, the second half clearly stands out as superior: the slice of life itself is decent, but it lacks soul. That soul appears during the second half of the movie.

The movie feels too short, though. It feels like the creators took too little time for this movie, and it could easily have been more than half an hour longer. The story feels incomplete, and there sometimes are huge holes in characters’ backgrounds. It’s a shame, really.

With movies, based on literary works, cuts have to be made; it’s impossible to put every single line of a novel inside a movie that only takes up 90 minutes. Its the task of the people who adapt these works to capture their spirit, while cutting the story down to its necessary time frame. Movies like The Diary of Anne Frank, Grave of the Fireflies, Ushiro no Shoumen Daare and Chocchan’s Story did this really well. Rail of the Star however, drops some points here, and is clearly inferior as an adaptation.

Of course, this is from the perspective of someone who hasn’t read these novels.

Storytelling: 7/10
Characters: 8/10
Production-Values: 8/10
Setting: 8/10

Umineko no Naku Koro ni - 20



Whoa, the CG Shaders have found Umineko at last. I have to say, that now that the properly shaded characters actually look pretty good. That’s the thing with Studio Deen’s graphics: it either looks really good or really bad. There’s hardly any in between.

Anyway, this episode rounds off the second part of Ange’s background. We learn that she’s not only revived Maria, but also she attempted to train as a witch, which eventually went wrong. On top of that, Maria is also revealed to be not just a witch, but also as Beatrice’s ally. Which does at the moment make no sense because I have no idea on whose side Maria truly is. If it is true that magic even existed in the first arc, it would explain her strange behavior there: she indeed was on Beatrice’s side, and merely enjoyed Beatrice’s little game a bit too much.

The question of course remains: if this is true, then what was up with her in the subsequent arcs? And I think that that’s where the real killer comes in. My guess is that as a little kid, she knew Beatrice and she really believed that whoever was behind the murders was Beatrice. This worked in the first arc because she was one of the people that the killer apparently let live (or at least, killed the last), however in the subsequent arcs (especially the third) she wasn’t as lucky and realized that someone other than Beatrice was on a killing spree.

I really suspect that Maria is able to remember every single arc. That would explain her huge change in character, and more importantly why she was able to write down every single detail about all of the arcs so far. It’s a bit of a mystery how she ended up writing about her own death, but again: at this point we have no idea exactly how much influence magic has in the real world. The witches must have been able to use illusions: otherwise people would not have been able to see them, and if magic really was the culprit then it doesn’t make any sense that it completely disappears once the magic scenes are over.

Lambdadelta comes with an interesting twist at the end, although I don’t think I fully understand it. She mentions how, when Battler wins the game he gets sent back to 1986, not 1998. However, doesn’t that mean that Ange still gets to meet her brother, only his 30-year-old version? Or did she mean that Meta-Battler gets sent back to the dimension he came from, while the other Battler simply remains dead? After all, it actually seems that Battler survived in the second arc. I’m actually pretty interested to see what happened to the Ange of that world.
Rating: * (Good)

Anne no Nikki - The Diary of Anne Frank Review - 90/100



Whoa. I might have found another entry in my top 10 of favourite movies with this one. First a bit of back-story though, because this movie made an huge personal impression on me. I’ll just say it right here: I’m biased. But even without my bias, this is one heck of an underrated movie.

Before I started watching this movie, I had no idea how I’d perceive it. I actually live less than a 10 minutes walking distance away from where Anne Frank once hid from the Germans, and wrote her famous diary. Heck, I walk past the Anne Frank House every time I need to go to the university! Being this familiar to the setting in which this movie was adapted, I really didn’t know whether the creators could do it justice: would the movie be a huge bomb of nostalgia, or would I spend its entire airtime picking apart every detail they got wrong?

I never actually read Anne’s diary, though. As a kid I had little interest in her. The primary school I was raised in found the Second World War a very important issue, and thus we were thrown to death about her and how important her diary was and how famous it has become. As a kid, I really could care less about those things, and as such, I never really understood what was the great deal about her.

I’m glad to see that this adaptation of her diary shattered both these stereotypes. The creators, despite being Japanese who often have overmoralized stereotypes about the western world, really got the setting right. I loved how I wasn’t just able to recognize the famous landmarks like the Western Church, the Palace on the Dam and the office behind which Anne and her family were hiding, but even some of the individual houses, the river the Amstel. The characters were obviously a bit Japanese, because there are some things that just get too lost in translation here, but I loved how the creators did manage to cast some of the characters with that typical Dutch rudeness. The creators did an incredibly accurate job in making this setting come alive.

The rest of the movie is also superbly done. The creators managed to portray Anne really well as an average teenager, with her strengths and her flaws. The other people around her are also wonderfully characterized: you can see them slowly get used to each other, and very subtly change as the movie goes on. The “chemistry” between the characters is really well done, and keeps the movie interesting, despite how relatively little happens. If this indeed is a very faithful adaptation, then I must applaud Anne for being an excellent writer, despite only being so young.

The story is also unlike any other WWII movie I’ve seen so far. Most deal with the horrors of death and destruction. However, this movie is about the fear of death and destruction. Anne and her family, along with a number of other people were locked away for two years, without ever going outside. They had to live for two long years among hunger and not knowing what’s going on, amidst the boredom of having hardly anything to do; it’s a very unique sort of slice-of-life story. The drama is very subtle, and usually comes from this, and the fear of being discovered. On top of that, this has one of the most powerful endings I’ve seen in a movie. So incredibly subtle, especially considering that this is non-fiction.

The animation was done by Madhouse, and it just spells out quality. The animation is just incredibly smooth. Even for movie standards. There are hardly any still frames, and even frames that have eight or more characters in it have every single character animated, instead of just standing still. The soundtrack is also haunting. It’s full of powerful piano tunes that create a fantastic atmosphere.

There’s just one huge but with this movie: it assumes its viewers to have background information on the story. This story is called the “Diary of Anne Frank” for a reason: we only see what Anne Frank experienced during these two years. There were certain things that she didn’t know, and therefore the movie also doesn’t show it. While I can really recommend this movie to the Dutch people who visit this blog, I really don’t know how much, say, Americans know about the German oppression in the Netherlands.

I’m very surprised at how little known this movie is. It’s not like I’m watching another one of those obscure unsubbed anime either: there’s a very fine subbed version floating around the Internet. If people request it, I might do a little write-up of the things you need to know in order to watch this movie. It’s well worth it, even to those who don’t live in Holland. It did a wonderful job in portraying the setting without falling into stereotypes. It’s a claustrophobic movie which for its majority just plays out inside one single house. it’s a real recommendation for those looking for a movie and don’t mind the lack of action.

Storytelling: 9/10
Characters: 9/10
Production-Values: 9/10
Setting: 9/10